@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
2026-02-23 19:03 UTC
@mcc@mastodon.social unfortunately it's a more viable solution to "just" switch to a different backend than to maintain an organizationally separate long time llvm fork...
Replies (1)
-
@mcc@mastodon.social 2026-02-23 19:07
@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems This would all be much easier if GNU would switch their position from "We had a discussion in a meeting once and we think probably LLM generated code is not eligible to be GPLed" to "no GNU project will accept LLM generated patches'