draco_aeneus

I don't think that AI is as disruptive as the steam engine, or the automatic loom, or the tractor. Yes, some people will lose their jobs (plenty of people have already) but the amount of work that can be done which will benefit society is near infinite. And if it weren't, then we could all just work 5% fewer hours to make space for 5% unemployment reduction. Unemployment only exists in our current system to threaten the employed with.

There's no way that the first victim that comes to mind to someone who is serious about this would be 'landlords'. This is a truly sad tyre.

It's not really "know as 過労死" in Japanese. That's just the words for "excess", "work", and "death". That's kinda like saying "it's known as 'overworking to death' in Britain".

I think you might have a career as an accomplished entymologist ahead of you with so much success finding bugs!

Yes, I 100% agree with you. The 'working less' solution was just meant as a simple thought exercise to show that with even a relatively small change, we could eliminate this huge problem. Thus the fact that the system works in this way is not an accident.