Replying to
Sad, that the recommendation is “use Bluetooth speakers instead, which are more expendable” instead of “are safe to use”.
Remote
Kissaki
@Kissaki@feddit.org
lemmy 0.19.20
0 Followers
0 Following
42 Posts
Joined July 14, 2024
Replying to
When will big companies lobby for patent law changes? I guess they still see enough value on the other end, with their own patents and lawsuits.
Replying to
They’re not lazy, they’re maliciously compliant.
Often times they're not even compliant.
a default-disabled prototype
No wonder it didn't show up in normal/enduser release notes.
This article suggests you have to disabled Enhanced Tracking Protection to test it. Does it replace that entire system with an equivalent system?
I'll wait until it's stable and productive.
Why do they source-link a random Twitter post but not the security researcher report nor the app the whole article is about? Every link is to their own articles.
If you're interested in a counter argumentation/expert analysis of previous posts, The Boy That Cried Mythos: Verification is Collapsing Trust in Anthropic is very critical about the whole press and marketing around Anthropic's Mythos. (lemmy post link)
Replying to
It's so stupid in Germany. It *was* state-owned. Then, privatization and Telekom expanded into other nations. In Germany, it violates net-neutrality, and sends repeated lying, misleading, and pressuring door-to-door marketing. For a premium cost, you don't get a premium service. Worse, it's still so big that it affects infrastructure over the whole of Germany. Insane.
"futurism has confirmed". Later on the article: "reached out to three parties, no replies and no comment".
Huh? So how did they confirm?
Replying to
forgetting to redact credentials that made it possible for all of Reddit to log into Epstein’s account and trample over all the evidence
/o\ 🤦
and “it was only once” is bullshit
They checked and then fired the author. I don't see how this is "it was only once" implying nothing changed and it will happen again. Isn't firing the author "holding journalism to a higher standard" already, which you ask for?
Replying to
It was on hold until now to encourage self discovery or sth
I'm just glad we didn't have to hold the line for a year to read this.
Replying to
Totally fine. Containerization comes at a cost too. It's a matter of system design, knowing your risks and complexities, and handling them accordingly.
With such a size, before containerization I'm wondering if these services are not independent enough to split them onto multiple servers.
Having everything together reduce system complexities in some ways, but not in other ways.
"Leaderboard" where rank one scores 0.3% success lol
Replying to
That doesn't sound like a web developer but like a web destroyer.
But is there also an option to show *only* shorts? Real free choice settings would offer that.
Replying to
Additionally, patentable materials must be novel, useful, and a non-obvious inventive step. - Wikipedia
What does the patent contain? Where is the non-obvious inventive step? Using an AI to impersonate someone doesn't strike me as novel, inventive, or surprising.
Replying to
The subheadline:
Android users involved in the class action could lawsuit could receive up to $100 each.
lol at the grammar though
They fear falling behind other browsers and losing users because of it.
They see AI prevalence and see it as an opportunity to profile and position Mozilla as a leader in "ethical ai".
They see AI use cases and success and think they have to integrate it to have additional, useful, significant features.
Replying to
It's insane to me that you claim it doesn't allow internal corruption when China is a very corrupt system.
There may be good systematic economy foundations, I can't speak much about those, but if they're not applied to everyone and just then it's besides the point.
Replying to
I had no idea the 50 years after death was the "minimum" and some countries add more years :O
/edit: I was a bit confused about the +50 list listing European countries, but the text saying something different.
In most countries of Africa and Asia, as well as Belarus, Bolivia, New Zealand and Uruguay; a work enters the public domain 50 years after the creator's death.
In Bangladesh, India, and Venezuela a work enters the public domain 60 years after the creator's death.
With the exception of Belarus (Life + 50 years) and Spain (which has a copyright term of Life + 80 years for creators that died before 1987), a work enters the public domain in Europe 70 years after the creator's death, if it was published during the creator's lifetime.
United States: Under the Copyright Term Extension Act, books published in 1930, films released in 1930, and other works published in 1930, will enter the public domain in 2026.
Replying to
The EUID effort is based on and for consolidating existing national solutions as well. They didn't start from scratch.
Replying to
"I am an independent contractor and technical MVP in whatever and am happy to help."
Replying to
No way of actually checking that they did delete anything
Not a random individual, but I would expect a court to be able to do so. Hold them, get an expert, verify.
Replying to
No need to trust. They gave very concrete references that would be easy to check.
Replying to
You can do it, but noboy has so far
What's your assessment of the German eID and AusweisApp2 that has been in use for many years?
Replying to on lemmy.world
Thanks; Linking for context https://bsky.app/profile/kei-urana.bsky.social
Looks like Boichi is there (now) too https://bsky.app/profile/boichibetoon.bsky.social
I watched this in a YouTube Shorts format a week ago, where they ask a few models about walking or driving to the car wash.
They have some more funny ask AI shorts.
Early 2026 car wash test compilation
Replying to
Why do you expect people to change their opinion based on who this is about?
Such people exist, but people who have integrity and think on principle exist too.
Replying to
Or maybe the bubble will pop, and we’ll have a repeat of 2008, except 100 times worse.
The AI spending and stock is much more localized. It's not grown over more years and integrated into many financial systems. So the results may be much less severe.
Replying to
CC BY-SA gives freedom of use. Why do you think additional consent would be necessary? Or do you mean that because the restricting conditions are not met, additional consent would be necessary?
Given the form of transformation, Share-Alike is certainly difficult to meet, if not impossible. Is that what you referred to with “is not open”? Or do you mean something else?
Replying to
AD is a security nightmare. EntraID requires internet but at least allows zero trust with diverse configuration and importantly without storing or holding session tokens or passwords locally.
For my company, the only blocker is file share, which can be migrated. All our with integration use ldap and can be migrated to openid. Luckily we don’t have more AD integrated stuff.
Replying to
On what basis did you proclaim “No! Not legal!” if you’re now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license?
Replying to
Nah, it seems much more likely to me that he’s all about the resources there and making money from them, as well as controlling the and projecting power from the entire hemisphere around US soil.
Ballistic missile defense may have been something he heard from someone, but I seriously doubt he makes strategic considerations and decisions like that, at least as a or the primary aspect.
Replying to
EntraID also seems corporate established. For a modern with system, with zero trust etc, you use EntraID instead of AD now.
Of course, legacy AD systems, if they exist, are also lock-in.
Replying to
F-Droid News: f-droid.org/…/f-droid-2.0-a-new-chapter-for-andro…
Replying to
Do you consider Lemmy not to be social media? I guess that’s the for the most part, rather than time used?
Replying to
Does your current stretch have a foreseeable end? Or do you think the very little programming will continue?
Replying to
I haven’t checked but I don’t see what as a reasonable assumption.
If they test for short burst performance specifically then the short runtime is the point. You then use multiple iterations of the test run to get a reasonable, reproducible result.