mastodon 4.7.3(Managing) director Open Science NL part of the Dutch Research Council @nwonieuws@bird.makeup | www.openscience.nl | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189… | Toots my own | X: @HLdeJonge@akademienl.social
Happy to share our new piece (w/ @MsPhelps@akademienl.social) on #metadata completeness in @crossref@mastodon.online and submission systems was published by #PLOSone. All data, code and peer review openly available. We'd be delighted to continue the conversation with publishers and submission system vendors:
📢 New preprint w/ @MsPhelps@akademienl.social!
We explore how manuscript submission systems may affect completeness of open metadata in @crossref@mastodon.online. Some systems seem to support richer metadata – but tech isn't the only factor.
What Jeroen is saying! 👇🏽
From: @jeroenson.bsky.social
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:l7e4szbrfwqgdgaxlaecf3lt/post/3m3xpxxeejk2m
Woekerwinsten voor uitgevers van wetenschappelijke tijdschriften, ondanks nieuwe regels - Follow the Money - Platform voor onderzoeksjournalistiek
https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/wetenschap-voor-iedereen-blijkt-melkkoe-voor-grote-uitgevers
Two main frameworks that shape research assessment in the NLs are moving to open research information in line with the Barcelona on Open Research Information: both the new Strategy Evaluation Protocol (SEP) and NWO's evidence based CV ask researchers and institutions to open indicators instead of closed data from proprietary databases.
Small but significant steps. More in our blog (w/ @LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl):
