Conversation (31)
Showing 5 of 31 cached locally.
26 comments are reported by the remote server but not cached here yet
Open reply Open reply
Guitarsophist
@jredlund@social.linux.pizza · Aug 16
@lproven@social.vivaldi.net Except there is no need for a robot. An AI will hack in and transfer the money somewhere. It's probably already happening. But at that point, money will be meaningless.
Open reply Open reply
Guitarsophist
@jredlund@social.linux.pizza · Aug 17
Thread reply
@itgrrl@infosec.exchange @lproven@social.vivaldi.net Yeah, but it was too true to be funny. Humor is difficult these days because irony is dead.
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Ozzelot
@ozzelot@mstdn.social · Aug 17
Thread reply
@jredlund@social.linux.pizza
Money is intrinsically meaningless anyway. It's just that enough of us agreed you need pictures of dead presidents or other historical figures to be under a roof and eat, somehow.
@lproven@social.vivaldi.net
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Wes Montage
@Wes_Montage@mastodon.social · Aug 16
@lproven@social.vivaldi.net Tyrell Wellick: "Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, but give a man a bank, and he can rob the world." If you really wanted to passively rob people, you would invent an AI bot that opens banks.
1
2
2