>we think in centuries There is a pile of dead sparrows that begs to differ.

One child policy and decimating farmland for factories. Centuries, man.

@JoeBravo77@poa.st They get caught up in fads too.

@JoeBravo77@poa.st "Ching chong Just kirr arr the rocust eating birds, what's the worst that can hapeeneru"

@JoeBravo77@poa.st the (((woman))) question must be addressed. Chairman Xi, put these broads in burkas NOW!

@JoeBravo77@poa.st That means the one-child policy was meant to kill off the population over a century.

>Thinking a lower population will destroy China or even significantly hurt their economy Neolibtard nonsense. You don't need a continuously growing population to have economic growth. Sure, the one child policy was an overreaction which decreased their population growth far too much. But this isn't going to destroy China or their economy. Neolibtards think the U.S is going to overtake China economically in a couple decades because the U.S has a younger and growing population, but this doesn't account for increaseing automation, and more importantly, that the future Chinese population will be much more eugenic than the subhuman retards that will make a larger proportion of the American population in the future. That is, unless we win and I can open my Death Valley Summer camp and restore Napa State Hospital to its former glory.