2026-02-22 00:36 UTC
@mcc@mastodon.social @itamarst@hachyderm.io I thought KeePassXC required human reviews / unit tests in order to mitigate any llm harms. Did that change?
More broadly, I don't really see how you can prove no LLMs were involved in code contributions if they are actually contributed by a human. Prove you used emacs or vi and didn't compile it ever on a cloud service? (I'm not happy about that state of affairs, mind you)
I suppose we can start adding some sort of watermark on code?
Replies (1)
-
@mcc@mastodon.social 2026-02-22 01:38
@draNgNon@hachyderm.io @itamarst@hachyderm.io "I thought KeePassXC required human reviews / unit tests in order to mitigate any llm harms. Did that change?" I literally don't give a shit. If you think it's OK to generate computer source code from a neural network, I don't trust yr judgement enough to trust your code reviews. "More broadly, I don't really see how you can prove no LLMs were involved in code contributions if they are actually contributed by a human." Same way you enforce any policy against stolen code