2025-03-24 11:29 UTC
@reiver@mastodon.social @dansup@mastodon.social
Makes me distrust the entire paper. The errors are obvious. If they didn't bother checking the accuracy of the easy stuff, how likely then that they put the effort into the more difficult stuff?
I dismissed the study when I saw this.
Replies (1)
-
@reiver@mastodon.social 2025-03-24 11:38
@Jerry@hear-me.social @dansup@mastodon.social The authors of the paper later put out a version 2 other paper that corrects the errors: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02611v2 ... But the original errors are still funny 🙂 And, an addition to Fediverse lore. .