2026-05-07 16:59 UTC
1. What surprised you in this document?
- pleasantly surprised by relative weight given to avoiding harm
- appalled by failure to examine serious questions around AI training practices (bias, intellectual property, privacy human labor) apart from a throwaway note in the appendix on AI creators’ design choices
- mystified by failure to consider economic implications of relying on oligopolistic commercial products currently heavily subsidized by venture capital investment
Replies (1)
-
@chronodm@glammr.us 2026-05-07 17:01
2. What topic was given too much and/or not enough attention/airtime/focus in this document? - environmental sustainability belongs throughout the doc (eg. in the "public good" section) not just relegated to its own section - sustainability section properly calls for assessing the full environmental lifecycle of AI systems, but we should also be assessing their full ethical and economic lifecycles - unclear why ethical framework is an appendix rather than integrated throughout the document