2026-09-15 08:47 UTC
@mason@partychickens.net @ProcessParsnip@mastodon.ie @libreoffice@fosstodon.org This is very morally grounded and idealistic. (I'm not trying to be insulting; I agree with you in the abstract that this is how things **should** be.)
There's a messy reality out there, and one of those messy realities is that passing a rule/law/whatever that is largely unenforceable waters down faith in and then obedience of rules/laws/whatever.
Sometimes you just have to accept the "good enough" over the perfect. I'm comfortable with the LO's policy.
Replies (1)
-
@mason@partychickens.net 2026-09-15 08:50
@qqmrichter@mastodon.world It's worth considering the variety of harms this technology inflicts on us, cognitively, economically, environmentally, before deciding that they're acceptable. The copyright problems (both training and in the reproduction of training-set data verbatim) alone should be enough, but it's not standing alone here. @ProcessParsnip@mastodon.ie @libreoffice@fosstodon.org