2026-09-15 08:50 UTC
@qqmrichter@mastodon.world
It's worth considering the variety of harms this technology inflicts on us, cognitively, economically, environmentally, before deciding that they're acceptable. The copyright problems (both training and in the reproduction of training-set data verbatim) alone should be enough, but it's not standing alone here.
@ProcessParsnip@mastodon.ie @libreoffice@fosstodon.org
Replies (1)
-
@qqmrichter@mastodon.world 2026-09-15 08:53
@mason@partychickens.net @ProcessParsnip@mastodon.ie @libreoffice@fosstodon.org Again. I agree with you that this is how things **should** be. How do you propose to enforce a blanket, pure, no-AI policy, however? Will you demand video of the contributor typing the code? I share your concern about AI slop damaging cognition and, especially in the hands of the inexpert, slipping in seriously damaging code. I also share your copyright concerns. But HOW DO YOU INTEND TO ENFORCE SUCH A RULING!?