2026-09-26 18:54 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@darkuncle@infosec.exchange 2026-09-26 19:10
@AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz @skewray@mathstodon.xyz I have thought about this a lot over the last 10 to 15 years; in defense of the new generation, the scope of technology in the world is so much broader than it was 25 or 30 years ago that I’m not sure it is still possible to be a generalist in the same way that those of us who started in the 80s or 90s had to be out of necessity
-
@paculino@tech.lgbt 2026-09-27 03:42
@AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz @darkuncle@infosec.exchange @skewray@mathstodon.xyz was that the worst instance at least?
-
@lispi314@udongein.xyz 2026-09-27 04:04
@AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz @darkuncle@infosec.exchange @skewray@mathstodon.xyz > Today, those who portray themselves as broad-based practitioners use the label “full-stack”—yeah, web only; go figure. That annoyed me greatly when I got hired for one. I meant to acquire more experience with system programming and native GUI work. Not "full LAMP stack + javascript" (what it really was is mostly backend server application and frontend javascript, rather off from my expectation).
-
@darkling@mstdn.social 2026-09-27 11:26
@AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz @darkuncle@infosec.exchange @skewray@mathstodon.xyz I've had people interviewing for senior dev positions who failed utterly with a pretty basic question, like "count the number of each type of character in a string". Like, couldn't even start.