#texte

www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor’s responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian. Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian’s established development practices. We enourage [sic] our contributors to disclose whether a contribution was made with AI assitance[sic], but do not require them to do so.

GrapheneOS is based on projects heavily using AI including the Linux kernel. Cellebrite, NSO and other exploit developers are using it to exploit these projects. They currently have a major advantage thanks to AI which will likely be turned into a major disadvantage over the long term. It's getting a huge backlog of bugs fixed and creating enormous pressure to make systemic improvements. Here's what Debian adopted, which is a similar idea but much more permissive: https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte

So Debian adopted a resolution on the use of “generative AI”: https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte Condorcet spoke: of all the options put to the vote, it must be a good compromise, an average of where the community stands. How much of a compromise is it really, though? 🧵

LLM usage in Debian neither endorsed nor prohibited https://lobste.rs/s/zctsmq #linux #vibecoding https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte

#zitate #texte #literatur #deutscheliteratur #armut #verzweiflung #kaputt #verwirrung #erichfromm