← Feed

Posts

• View post

  @nova that's pretty interesting and nice to use, thanks for the effort :)

• View post

  @erictopol I had to read the substack several times as it confuses rates and excess. I know you're exceptionally busy, so hoping to help you update easily so it agrees clearly with the table: "The results are summarized below. By rapid antigen testing, viral rebound occurred in 14% of the Paxlovid group and in 9% of controls, for an excess of 5%. With respect to symptoms, the rate was nearly 18% compared with 7%, giving an excess of 12% for Paxlovid versus controls."

• View post

  @ziya made me think a moment, what if we'd kept horses, instead of petroleum(and coal) engines; where would we stand on warming now with the methane? Though probably there would be fewer persons, thus less need for transport? Steam writers can do the estimation :)

• View post

  @gretathunberg Besides other appreciations of what you composed here, Greta, there is one statement which leaps out at me -- one that very saliently seems never mentioned in how the world press 'handles' klima in our time. You said it takes reduction of 15% per year, to meet the less than 2 degree goal. (cont'd...)

• View post

  @gretathunberg (continuing...) This make matters very productively concrete, instead of the all or nothing, conflict of foes which seems always the news story. With such a figure, individuals could say, yes, that is something we could do. They could feel the possibility which enables. Maybe to hear this thought is useful to you....all best...and again, appreciation :)

• View post

  @erictopol quite wonderful to find your sight and so regularly on all the things you write on, Eric. For one person, the Covid paths especially, but then as in this one, all the ways in life that health provides, inspires....