@hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
2026-07-28 18:36 UTC
@kbal@fedia.io @trashheap@tech.lgbt That’s the issue with using LLMs, only the author knows exactly how and how much they used it. If anyone gets a whiff they’re using it, there will be a constant doubt about the usage scope which taints the reception of said writing. Even if the author is confortable with their own use and final output, the lingering doubt will lose them readers.
Replies (1)
-
@kbal@fedia.io 2026-07-28 19:05
Yeah. Somehow it's more difficult to get past that familiar feeling of wondering if what you're reading is in part machine-generated rationalisations when the topic being written about is how convenient it is to use all the AI tools.