2026-10-03 10:29 UTC
addendum: reaaally Mastodon?
Anyway. Yes I AM aware of the Dutch CROW rules. 96b could apply here.
We're in Denmark though. So this otherwise excellent bit of bicycling infrastructure transitions (badly) into a car-first gravel path (actually the exit to one) a couple 100 meters away. In the other direction the community placed a metal chicane over half the lane.
On a sunny day, cycling away from the sun, it's 100% the cyclist fault for cycling at high speed into a high-viz static object.
Replies (1)
-
@Pepijn@mastodon.online 2026-10-03 14:20
Ffs. What is it with bike stuff and people feeling personally attacked? I just blocked (figured 'mute' would just lead to them annoying others without me even realizing) another person claiming that my cone & cargobike existing on the bike lane directly endangered the cyclist. Considering this cyclist overlooked both a large cargotrike & "highway type" traffic cone I'm very happy I had placed them there as the alternative would've been crashing into my toddler (with high-viz headgear ).