2026-10-21 17:13 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 2026-10-21 17:19
the discussion of ethics is irrelevant as long as we live in capitalism. there’s not ethical consumption under capitalism, using ai is no different from eating chocolate or drinking coffee. you’d be surprised by the amount of slave labour that’s used today. now, if you oppose because of technological limitations, such as water/energy consumption, this is a very different topic and it’s not an ethical one, which to be honest is not even a very valid argument since it has been solved by open local models. then you might have an issue with the corporations behind some models, but that’s not an issue with “AI”. i also dislike the west, but to be AI is not israelgpt.
-
@alottafagina@lemmy.ml 2026-10-21 18:49
Why is it that every single time you see someone trying to claim the role of ‘adult in the room’, they appear to be speaking from a perspective of being perfectly oblivious (albeit sometimes for the purpose of obfuscation)? Did you miss the part where OP’s entire argument was ‘fuckstick’? Yes, fuckstick. That’s the whole point to a lot of people. I swear, the level of smugness of AI true believers is totally inappropriate.
-
@Auli@lemmy.ca 2026-10-22 14:03
What I find funny do the people who oppose llms for ethical.reasons also oppose every other tech they use for ethical reasons.