@tao@mathstodon.xyz Another compounding factor is that the review process, even for a single publication, might be becoming more difficult and subtle. Everyone knows that LLMs are prone to introduce errors, but it might become increasingly harder to spot them (in comparison to human-made errors), because LLMs are trained to be glib and convincing (and are constantly getting better at it). Combine this with the fact that we all routinely underestimate how easy we are to manipulate, and the prospect is bleak.