2026-09-09 06:58 UTC
@jmma1980@mastodon.social @srinivas @tao that is quite literally the opposite of what is happening. we get proofs but no intuition
Replies (1)
-
@jmma1980@mastodon.social 2026-09-09 08:25
@uniwuni@deadinsi.de That is precisely the paradox. Academia produces formal proofs, yet hides where the raw intuition originally came from—often silent-scraping preprints. If the guild hides its own human sources, they aren't being any more transparent than the AI companies they criticize. Double standards don't validate science; open attribution does. They are just trying to protect their economic interests, not the advancement and recognition of the intuitions that unlock 200 years of paralysis.