2026-10-22 19:44 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@Ardyvee@europe.pub 2026-10-23 00:06
Hasn’t changed much. I have accepted the risk and, for now, the desire to have publicly accessible stuff outweights my lack of desire to deal with the realities of a VPN. I mean, I want to share stuff with others, and I want to be hosting it myself because I have grown to distrust someone else’s service… so what else can I do but risk it? Besides: I expect tailscale or the underlying VPN services to already be a target. I would be surprised if they don’t find anything. What then?
-
@adrianlee_dev@lemmy.world 2026-10-26 01:35
My server was recently compromised via the latest vulnerability. Fortunately, the damage wasn’t too severe. Since my server must remain publicly accessible, it can’t be hidden behind a VPN—I can only minimize its exposure as much as possible while ensuring my backup and recovery processes are rock-solid. I’ve configured the firewall to allow only essential ports, restricted SSH access to key-based authentication, enabled automatic installation of security updates, and set up daily backups, one of which is synchronized to an off-site location. Some have suggested treating public-facing machines as if they’ve already been compromised by default. I agree with this approach, and it’s exactly what I plan to do next.