2026-06-25 01:14 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@Arpie4Math@mathstodon.xyz 2026-06-30 12:48
#Beatty v. #Trump (25-cv-04480, District Court, D.C.) #Lawsuit over the #KennedyCenter capture, renaming, and closure. As per court order, yesterday the Trump board had to "answer or otherwise respond" to Beatty's lawsuit. They gave up on additional motions to dismiss and answered. So the biggest possible takeaway is that this is likely to last a while and soon discovery can begin. You have to read the answer (Doc 61) side-by-side with the Amended Complaint (Doc 12) to understand the gap between the parties that the lawsuit needs to close. Paragraph numbers are used for citations, rather than pages, because because every word counts. 1 has the boilerplate "no response is required. To the extent a response is required, the remaining allegations are denied." which seems to say they are willing to die on the hill that Trump hadn't "announced plans to demolish the building" this summer. Bold choice! 2 similarly ignores the illegal vote. 3 admits and act violating the organic statute that created the Kennedy Center. Maybe this lawsuit could have been an email? 4 admits the Trump stooges are so bad at being fiduciaries that they don't know when or why the patrons fled. 5 puts Trump's own words on trial. 6 leans hard into "you can't tell us what the law means" but ignores that Congress and permit offices are actual real things with timelines and documents. ... 26: Admitted: President Trump also appointed himself as a general trustee and had the Board elect him as the new chair. This is unprecedented. No American president has ever appointed himself as a trustee of the Kennedy Center, let alone sought to serve as chair. ... and so on...