Yeah, I mean there’s some more reasons to accuse someone of using AI. Fro example repetitive stuff that doesn’t really say anything meaningful. Or if a post sounds 100% like some Reddit stereotype. Or is copied from another place and slightly rephrased. And ChatGPT has a distinctive way of writing. If you always start with a reaffirmation, then point out there’s two sides to each coin and then lose it in some borderline correct, borderline incorrect ramblings… It’ll just sound like ChatGPT to me. I can’t help it! More often than not it’ll turn out it’s a bot. But I’m not correct all the time. Clues like someone saying something interesting, or exceptionally stupid would count more towards the human indicators, to me. Dunno. I guess we have to put up with it.