with him being a lover and a loud public advocate of it. I googled the guy’s name and as expected, I found him suggesting ai is good for finding bugs now, unlike in the past. No quotes of him praising its use let alone across the board. I am general against AI but what exactly is the point of opposing it to the point of denying it has any use whatsoever, exaggerating anything anyone says remotely in favor of it, or in this case making up harm that AI hypothetically may have caused? Doing things like that is just destroying the credibility of opposing AI, and I see this kind of approach to it constantly on here. No, Linux is not “vibecoded” now. No, Torvalds is not an AI simp now. Yes, there are some uses of AI that are probably worth the downsides (which anyone can see and should admit to). Binary thinking is not productive.