2026-09-18 15:58 UTC
@romli@social.vivaldi.net @ibboard@hachyderm.io @markwyner@mas.to You wrote "restricting social media for under 13s".
So ok, not "13-year olds", but "under 13-year olds". The difference is one day.
You will have to explain to me why a bunch of 12-year olds having a meeting at a park bench is very different from them having a group chat online.
Replies (1)
-
@ibboard@hachyderm.io 2026-09-18 16:08
@ahltorp@mastodon.nu @romli@social.vivaldi.net @markwyner@mas.to I think we've found the clear signs of an inauthentic argument now. Definitely just "asking questions" and totally not "being intentionally contrarian by taking things to extremes in ways that no-one is really arguing about and denying having said things they said in the previous post" 🙄