@natsume_shokogami@mastodon.world
2025-03-04 09:41 UTC
@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org @simonzerafa@infosec.exchange @protonprivacy@mastodon.social @mozillaofficial@mastodon.social I mean something as simple like text-to-speech or OCR or machine translation models (like Google Translate/DeepL) can be considered "AI" technically. I'm a student and many courses involving creating our own models from scratch and many of my projects involving use models like tesseract-ocr, turtle-tts, YOLO, LLaMA,... for some tasks and this is painful for me as many outputs don't even make sense and I had to tweak a lot.
Replies (1)
-
@natsume_shokogami@mastodon.world 2025-03-04 09:47
@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org @simonzerafa@infosec.exchange @protonprivacy@mastodon.social @mozillaofficial@mastodon.social Though I noticed that despite the claims of AI bros that their models are better, or they can solve something, they rarely say exactly what model they use (or just algorithms or more simple models cloaking as "AI" for them).