2026-03-11 00:12 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@Axomamma@mastodon.online 2026-03-11 00:32
@briankrebs omfg.
-
@cafechatnoir@mastodon.social 2026-03-11 00:37
@briankrebs Ugh, why was I burdened with a fucking conscience... Could have been making shitty things and selling them to Meta.
-
@dalias@hachyderm.io 2026-03-11 00:38
@briankrebs Who came up with the skibidi toilet themed illustration? 😂
-
@Lee_Holmes@infosec.exchange 2026-03-11 00:41
@briankrebs This seems more likely to be an acquihire. I doubt they care about a social network for bots. But somebody that can make a viral AI one is definitely a better hire than a rando that stuffed their resume with the right keywords :)
-
@the_moep@mastodon.de 2026-03-11 00:55
@briankrebs Another thing on the shit-pile that is Facebook I mean "Meta"
-
@ragectl@hachyderm.io 2026-03-11 01:19
@briankrebs *Meta purchased all the user data
-
@jacques@mastodon.chester.id.au 2026-03-11 01:46
@briankrebs oblig. self-link: https://mastodon.chester.id.au/@jacques/116206517970907194
-
@AGMS00@ruby.social 2026-03-11 03:08
Meta acquiring Moltbook makes sense. Advertising for ‘bots. Get them hooked on your infrastructure, then you can sell ads for services those robots use. The clueless vibe coders won’t know if they’re overpaying for a service that a ‘bot was biased to like by a carefully crafted advertisement. Doesn’t matter who makes the AI, Meta still profits. Though would it be better as a dating site (skill matchmaker), or as a ‘bot LinkedIn, or maybe a StackOverflow?