2024-10-07 19:27 UTC
Update. The Journal of Cardiac Failure switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review to increase the number of its women authors. Three years later it reports the results.
https://onlinejcf.com/article/S1071-9164(24)00378-6/abstract
(#paywalled)
"The proportion of women first authors increased from 24% in Era 1 to 34% in Era 2 to 39% in Era 3 while the percentage of women authors serving in a senior authorship role remained fairly stable over time around 21-22%."
Replies (1)
-
@petersuber@fediscience.org 2024-10-24 17:24
Update. New study: "Female-led [scientific] teams generate more novel and disruptive ideas. However, they tend to produce articles with fewer scientific impact [sic] compared to their male-led counterparts…Further analysis indicates that this gender bias intensifies in later career stages and with larger team sizes." https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/doi/10.1162/qss_a_00335/124962/Female-led-teams-produce-more-innovative-ideas-yet