Elektrine lite

← Feed

@krashmo@lemmy.world

2026-10-18 16:02 UTC

People who don’t eat at restaurants at all are obviously not the same as people who don’t eat at a restaurant that doesn’t exist. You said you understood that concept but then spent the rest of your comment describing people who want to eat at restaurants.

Replies (2)

  • @Objection@lemmy.ml 2026-10-18 16:09

    People who don’t eat at restaurants at all are obviously not the same as people who don’t eat at a restaurant that doesn’t exist. Legitimately don’t understand this word salad. You said you understood that concept but then spent the rest of your comment describing people who want to eat at restaurants. Someone who doesn’t currently eat at restaurants might start eating at them if the restaurants find a way to appeal to them. That’s not a complicated concept. Likewise, someone who doesn’t vote might start voting if they’re appealed to. This is equally uncomplicated.

    Open ##5112506

  • @frisbird@lemmy.ml 2026-10-18 18:51

    This is what your commitment to your narrative has done to you. It has made you believe that there is a category of people who don’t vote because that is what they prefer, and you’re so committed that you are willing to make nonsense arguments that posit the existence of people who eat food but specifically will not and never will eat food if it’s in a restaurant. Nothing about your narrative is reasonable. Give people something they want and they will pursue it

    Open ##5115894