@TCatInReality@mastodon.social
2025-12-30 13:59 UTC
@thecyberwitch
5) ID and face verifications are fine options for those willing, but we need more options. If you read OSA, those two were only some options. It is the unregulated age gating techbros choosing these most invasive approaches to offer - not the gov
6) Yes, I am troubled by what an LGBTQ "hostile" gov (or any human rights denying bias) could do with the law. But that's true to all laws. I'm not prepared to give techbros free rein. We need better democratic processes
3/n
Replies (1)
-
@TCatInReality@mastodon.social 2025-12-30 14:04
@thecyberwitch Now, I have tried to answer your questions earnestly. Here's my main questions: A) Do you think we have enough evidence of real world harms from techbros to start regulating the online world, or should we continue with total immunity and self-regulation? B) If we need regulation, and given this is the process that we have, do we make the best of it and continually refine (like all laws) or do we wait (if so, for what)? To me, this is a simple product safety issue. /End