Frustrating arguments include: - JPEG XL proponents arguing that JXL is on-par or better than AVIF for majority Web use cases, relying on either outdated info or wishful thinking. - JXL critics exaggerating risks and dismissing long-tail and cross-ecosystem use cases. (E.g. recently Jake Archibald wrote that the “JXL is a nice to have” argument would justify adding browser support for proprietary RAW formats as a nice-to-have — a wildly excessive comparison.)