@tao@mathstodon.xyz If AI eventually becomes the primary way of generating proofs, generating expositions, and curating results, what is the role of humans? It seems unlikely to me that human understanding will persist if humans aren’t given tasks to exercise and demonstrate our understanding. Delegating curation to AI also makes me uncomfortable. I think most people agree by now that the algorithmic recommendations have negatively impacted society as a whole. Do we want to go down the same route with scientific publishing?