@Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club
2026-10-07 17:34 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@kromem@lemmy.world 2026-10-07 21:33
Now, after release, here’s an example of the initial thoughts of someone who had spent time on one of the solved problems:
-
@roserose56@lemmy.zip 2026-10-08 05:54
What if it does some wrong or fake equations ? Like who cares? USA is putting AI first, not mathematicians.
-
@thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2026-10-07 18:19
Several employees within OpenAI believe their technology has rendered math dead anyway, according to people who have spoken with them. They do believe a lot of things about their magic word machine.
-
@givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2026-10-07 17:42
archive.is/…/openai-is-pissing-off-a-bunch-of-mat… TLDR: Most of the “mathematical breakthroughs” from AI have been done by loading all available recent research from humans solving the problem, and then collating it while skipping reviews and telling the humans who did the work it would literally be “too complicated” to explain the AI didn’t actually do anything… It’s all just lies to drive up stock prices, what they release appears to be stuff that would be released shortly anyways, it’s just being dumped at once 99% of the way done before it’s verified.
-
@RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 2026-10-08 08:53