@davidcelis@xoxo.zone Wild guess: Mitchell is probably taking nominal investment and retaining like, 90%+ control for himself. Perhaps just as he recognized his own limitations as CEO, maybe he recognizes the need for outside voices, and a network to get his thing accepted. So some of these VCs may seem to have bad social/political priorities, but the real worry is the financial priorities common to all VCs. And none of those are going to matter, I think?