2026-10-17 21:29 UTC
I think the point is that it actually hurts an ethics-based anti-AI argument to also claim that it has no utility, because the utility argument is weak and therefore makes the rest of the stance (i.e., the ethics-based argument) look weak by association.
Replies (1)
-
@dev_null@lemmy.ml 2026-10-17 21:32
Exactly, if you say that AI is ethically bad and doesn’t work, to someone who uses it and clearly sees it works well for them, it just invalidates your argument. If you just stick to the ethics your argument can’t be dismissed in that way.