@algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club
2026-08-08 14:08 UTC
Also, a few more incredible opinions in this tool:
Consistent use of ? is an AI smell, because why the fuck wouldn't human authors prefer consistent error propagation.Preferring exhausting matching in match expressions is an AI smell, because following best practices is now a thing only AI do.Long method chaining is also an AI smell, because composability and the builder pattern are inherently inhuman or something.Relying on type inference is also an AI smell, because a human will always write annotations, because their language server can't tell them the underlying type or something.
Replies (3)
-
@algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club 2026-08-08 14:11
I'm going to stop here, because this is getting more sad than hilarious. That there are people who believe these kind of metrics, and this kind of scoring is correct-ish.
-
@khleedril@cyberplace.social 2026-08-08 17:22
@algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club You meant to say, ''why the fuck wouldn't human authors prefer consistent error propagation???''
-
@muddle@infosec.exchange 2026-08-08 23:38
@algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club "fluent" interfaces bad. Hmm. (maybe Rust uses slightly different terminology; I can't remember)