Post by @Urist@lemmy.ml

2026-10-02 22:37 UTC

To be fair, many of the imperialist wars in the middle east has been joint military operations of a certain NATO members. They have not really been sanctioned NATO operations though, with quite a few in NATO in opposition to the wars. That being said, the distinction may seem meaningless when NATO resources are used by thr imperialists anyway. However, the level of material support for the US agression towards Iran has been met with less support than before. The point is to be historically precise so that we can identify the development of the fracture of US domination within the imperial core.

Replies (2)

@CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2026-10-03 00:49

Absolutely unrelated, but I love the username, should we get a dwarffortress community going? (unless that’s already a thing and I’m just missing out lol)

Open ##4915106
@MaxLemminist@lemmy.ml 2026-10-03 07:55

the level of material support for the US agression towards Iran has been less than before, maybe even remarkably so. That has nothing to do with morals or the imaginary independence from the US. The only difference is that Iran is not a defenseless resource-rich country where they can help the big bully leader in return for some crumbs of the loot. They know joining this war would mean actual war and cost them a lot. It’s pure cowardice. You only have to hear what that worm Rutte says or the ghouls VDL and Kallas. They shamelessly give full verbal support to the nazi empire, condemn Iran and would be helping the war criminals if it were without consequence.

Open ##4916181