2026-10-07 21:49 UTC
Making things very obscured is not a proof.
The guy is politely saying it’s nonsense
Replies (4)
-
@BassTurd@lemmy.world 2026-10-07 23:20
I don’t think that’s what’s being said. More like the complexities of the solution are taking a while to understand because it is a complex solution using complex math. Even the smartest people in their fields can’t always look at a solution and at a glance understand everything without truly digesting what they’re seeing.
-
@ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2026-10-08 06:07
Can you expand on how you came to this conclusion?
-
@ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2026-10-08 07:42
It sounds more like when AI won in Go for the first time. People were looking at the game and saying “humans don’t play like that, we don’t understand those moves”.
-
@phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2026-10-08 08:37
I think it’s more that he’s saying “interesting approach, but not verified yet.”