2026-09-20 23:08 UTC
FEP-c0d0: Context Locking
I don't see much in 171b re: access/reply controls.
That said 171b also is an opinionated departure from 1b12 so might be we'd want access controls split off from 171b perhaps, so they can be shared?
cc @julian@fietkau.social
Replies (1)
-
@julian@fietkau.social 2026-09-20 23:19
@julian@activitypub.space @silverpill@mitra.social I believe it's mainly this: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/171b/fep-171b.md#moderation If the context owner refuses to acknowledge any and all incoming replies, the thread is effectively locked. The approach seems like it would pair well with either interaction policies on the context object and/or a FEP-c0d0-like flag, so actors can know in advance which kinds of activities are likely to succeed or fail, i.e. so UI hints can be provided (grayed out buttons etc).