Post by @uberfreeza@lemmy.world

2026-10-24 15:20 UTC

Absolutely. That’s why I include voting in primaries. I’d rather us have 0% hitler. But when the two choices (in practice) are 100% hitler and 99% hitler, I’d still prefer to have 1% less hitler. And it shouldn’t mark someone as 100% hitler to feel that way.

Replies (5)

@elixir_fan@lemmy.ml 2026-10-24 15:25

It still shows a complete lack of solidarity with the rest of marginalized people, including those being ethnically cleansed inside the US, and to those being bombed, droned, sanctioned, starved, etc abroad. Sanders is a liberal Zionist, AOC is pro-imperialism in Latin America, and even Mamdani conceded a lot of nonsense to the right, even agreeing with gusanos that Cuba and Venezuela are dictatorships, doing his part in normalizing the atrocities we see now there by the US government. Mamdani is the best of the bunch by far and he’s still bad to us.

Open ##5227611
@chloroken@lemmy.ml 2026-10-24 15:54

Trolley-problem-ass poster. So fucking embarrassing. For everyone else, dialectical materialism.

Open ##5227837
@BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2026-10-24 16:24

“If we’re going to have Hitler, I’d rather the Hitler that preserves the long term stability and power of the Reich”

Open ##5228200
@NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 2026-10-24 16:56

So you’d vote for genocide as long as the other guy was gonna do 2 genocides?

Open ##5228684
@Kamuka@thelemmy.club 2026-10-24 21:59

It’s more like 100% Hitler and 99% disappointing people who aren’t realistic

Open ##5231256