2026-04-02 19:26 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@laird@hachyderm.io 2026-04-02 20:05
@swhobbit@hachyderm.io I had a similar-vintage HP MFP, I think it was the same basic printer. It died with multiple error codes that I wasn't able to fix after swapping multiple parts and staring at the service manual. So I ended up getting a brother to replace it, because current HPs are problematic. You can't really compare a modern photo inkjet to a color laser, though. There's basically no overlap in use cases. I'm not convinced that the new Canon is even able to load more than a couple pages of paper at a time, and it really wants you to manually feed paper one sheet at a time via the manual feed slot. It'd be terrible as a "regular printer." The results when printing pictures go exactly the opposite way, though. I've never seen a color laser that's better than "not horrible" with pictures, while modern photo inkjets are probably the highest-quality way to print images, ahead of traditional wet photographic printing.