@thecyberwitch@mastodon.social
2025-12-30 01:32 UTC
@TCatInReality I still stand by that statement by and large, but it isn't as extreme (or reflexive) as it might have initially come across. Yes, reasonable laws should and DO exist to protect the vulnerable, but responsibility for children does primarily rest on parents, again by law. Neglectful parenting used as an excuse for mass surveillance and censorship is where I start to get a little snarky.
Replies (1)
-
@TCatInReality@mastodon.social 2025-12-30 11:58
@thecyberwitch Certainly, I oppose mass surveillance and (most) censorship. And certainly, parents should parent But I believe you misunderstand the world we live in if you think parents bear the bulk of responsiblity for child safety. In our world, all gov have mountains of product safety laws for manufacturers. Then mountains more for safe usage and distribution. It is in THIS world, already after layers of safety, do we expect parents to protect their children. 1/2