Post by @VaxxSabbath@detroitriotcity.com

2026-09-27 22:11 UTC

@JollyR@nicecrew.digital @jb@nicecrew.digital @judgedread@poa.st nobody ever publishes accurate statistics on troop casualties, that’s Military 101 you don’t provide an enemy information on how effective their attacks are trvke: Iran is not “winning” this conflict for any rational values of “winning”; the Containment-Right shills are 100% correct on that score the destruction of US bases is, to my mind, mostly a red herring - the current events pattern-match best to a strategy of “break everything on the way out the door”, rendering surviving global petrochemical energy flows under greater control by judeoglobohomo, which has already attained dispensational capability over them within its realm (see: global warmunism, woke climate bullshit, ESG and so forth) as far as They are concerned, They do not give a shit if you freeze and starve (this is a net plus for them), as long as They have adequate fuel for their limousines and private jets and enough electricity to power their AI control systems and pedo dungeons, and the oil resources necessary to maintain Their standard of living at that level are orders of magnitude smaller than currently exist; Their best move is to remove non-aligned/-controlled competitors from the board, which They are visibly doing (Russia, the Middle East) think of this less as a game to seize control than one to destroy productive capacity (thereby magnifying their effective control over what’s left), and a lot of seemingly inexplicable behaviors become immediately understandable effectively responding to this is a tough problem - creating and maintaining production is something that requires billions of dollars of capital that at present, /areguys/ do not have at this point Iran is a disappointment - I’d have hoped for way more bombardment of Usuria, but they don’t seem to have it in them and are busy spraying-and-praying all of the people that might otherwise be religiously inclined to assist them; one would think that they could put aside questions of “the succession of the Imam” in favor of “let’s just kill jews first, then worry about that shit later”, but ragheads gonna rag, so

Replies (2)

@VaxxSabbath@detroitriotcity.com 2026-09-27 22:25

@JollyR@nicecrew.digital @jb@nicecrew.digital @judgedread@poa.st the best plays for energy independence are probably these, roughly in descending order of immediate personal utility: solar (not great, but has definitely improved)biomass (not terribly efficient, labor- and area-intensive without a lot of capital)geothermal (doable, tech is improving, but locale-dependent)nuclear (lots of regulatory problems here) the thing about most of these is that they are static - they tie you to a location, generally, though with better battery technology that is less of an issue this kind of pattern-matches to the historical “peasant/agricultural” vs. “hunter-gatherer/nomad” shift; power production is more efficient when centralized, but even at small scale, tends to bind you to a specific place without a portable energy source, of which “petrochemicals” are the most efficient form so far in terms of safety/reliability/efficiency, all things considered unless somebody can come up with a nuclear battery that produces somewhere order-of-magnitude close to gasoline in terms of kWh/kg, with reasonably effective shielding, this is going to force a shift in things whose implications are not clear; I have high hopes for jailbroken AI to improve defensive capability for static emplacements, which might shift the balance of power back towards some kind of livable equilibrium a homestead with a couple MW power generation that can’t be interdicted, complete with biodiesel generator and sentry guns ringed around it is a pretty stable arrangement (especially if all your neighbors have one too), since imposing globohomo hegemony over everything requires wasting huge amounts of resources to serially destroy each and every one of them I think about this a lot

Open ##4873415
@JollyR@nicecrew.digital 2026-09-27 22:33

> think of this less as a game to seize control than one to destroy productive capacity, and a lot of seemingly inexplicable behaviors become immediately understandable A lot of recent events fit this pattern, starting before Trump was in the Whitehouse. Mostly peaceful protests with arson and terrorism, destruction of industry and military with "diversity", the "pandemic", efforts to start race wars against white European stock, efforts to start gender wars, the culling of flocks and herds based on bogus covid-like PCR "tests", the proxy war in the Ukraine, and now they're trying to start WWIII.

Open ##5461130