2025-11-25 04:23 UTC
@SPF@hear-me.social @briankrebs@infosec.exchange I think 12%? But still not bad.
Unless 132% was meant to say “100% of 2019, plus 32% growth,” in which case it’s only 4% annually, which feels a lot more reasonable.
Replies (1)
-
@mnalis@mastodon.online 2025-11-25 13:01
@darthnull@infosec.exchange if that was the case (only 32% growth), graph would've started at 100%, not at 0%, no? @SPF@hear-me.social @briankrebs@infosec.exchange