@briankrebs__dup_6@infosec.exchange
2026-03-02 13:40 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@n1xnx@tilde.zone 2026-03-02 14:51
@briankrebs There's a trivially easy way for the person claiming not to be Dort to prove his innocence. Submit his hardware and accounts to direct inspection by a neutral third party. If his claim of account hijack is true, this would even help him mitigate that damage. However, I rather strongly suspect that's all BS, and the identified individual really is the criminal (SWATting is most definitely a crime the police would be interested in).
-
@xconde@social.chinwag.org 2026-03-02 18:39
@briankrebs oh wow Dort is losing his shit 😂 Keep up the excellent work!
-
@fencepost@infosec.exchange 2026-03-02 19:09
@briankrebs first part of the article is available on your homepage, but the article itself 403s Edit: wonder if that was a vpn defense.
-
@klausi@mastodon.social 2026-03-02 22:01
@briankrebs oh wow, look at all the infosec.exchange harassment reply accounts here. They really have a moderation problem 😳