@ChristiJunior@detroitriotcity.com
2026-09-24 22:58 UTC
@Rasterman@detroitriotcity.com Nintendo is very weird with their release schedules: some franchises have a strict One Game Per Console policy, like Mario Kart and Smash Bros. Others get a steady stream of new releases like Kirby and Fire Emblem. And then you have Metroid and F-Zero, who went through periods of such frequent releases that it caused gamer burnouts (look at how many F-Zero games we got during the GCN/GBA era), and who then got iced because the last entry sold poorly. You could argue that something similar also happened to the New Super Mario Bros. games.
A new high quality game every 3-4 year might be ideal, especially if the franchise has a strong 2D *AND* 3D presence, so you effectively get a new game every other year.
Replies (1)
-
@Rasterman@detroitriotcity.com 2026-09-24 23:19
@ChristiJunior@detroitriotcity.com F-Zero 99 is like a thing you do when the patent is about to expire. We still haven't gotten a true F-Zero sequel. They have themselves to blame for releasing 3 in a row during the GBA era. It must've been the age of future racers. They have Shin'en who know how to do it. They just need the budget. Or they can trust the greatest Nintendo developer... :pepe_read: ...Sega? :pepe_feelsweird: PS: the black guy was made aware of Jaffe and laughed at him for getting stuck there.