@JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social
2026-09-28 08:30 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social 2026-09-28 08:35
The account from the female farmer who called 999 early on Sunday morning…
-
@GrumpyOldFart@expressional.social 2026-09-28 10:10
@JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social Plausible? “Even though we attacked Iran first, they will probably spin it into something like this: ‘Iran is attacking the UK, even though we are a neutral party. Therefore we have no choice but to get involved’. This would be a terrible legal and moral argument, but it just needs to convince stupid people. We have to take sure stupid people are not taken in by this crap” https://open.substack.com/pub/councilestatemedia/p/was-fairford-the-most-embarrassing #UK #Fairford #Iran #Terrorism #FalseFlag
-
@Nikkileah@mendeddrum.org 2026-09-28 08:54
@JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social oh, don't mind the whiff... That's Streetings' signature fragrance: "Desperation; for men".
-
@gregc@mastodonapp.uk 2026-09-28 09:03
@JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social I take the view that... "With respect, though, she does only have a partial picture. And that’s as far as I wish to go this morning.” is almost certainly the case. It is frequently the case in any criminal investigation you let the guys doing the job go further than a member of the public might think is reasonable or wise in order to get a better understanding and knowledge of those directing the operation. For me it is the second sentence that is far more powerful than the first.