2026-10-21 11:49 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@Ooops@feddit.org 2026-10-21 13:44
But that doesn’t matter! Join the crusade!! AI is either the devil incarnate or our lord and savior! No in-between (no sanity in particular) allowed. And as long as you are still not gone insane and argue rationally the bombardment of at least one pro-, one anti-AI post/article about Linux per day has to continue…
-
@phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2026-10-21 14:51
Completely this. As long as the code is good,. does it matter where it came from?
-
@chloroken@lemmy.ml 2026-10-21 15:08
It’s been said a billion times: you don’t get to decide what I find relevant. The only reason these clowns want to hide their behavior is because they’re ashamed of the criticism. There is no other reason to hide attribution.
-
@atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2026-10-21 15:31
On the contrary, a small piece of text that says “this code deserves more review because humans may not have seen it” is absolutely necessary. All this is doing is making it so I can hide that I didn’t touch the code.
-
@JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2026-10-21 15:32
They why try to hide it? If AI is not problematic at all, why do 90% of AI bros hide it and refuse to disclose and when they do are often extremely cagey about it? For these types of projects, it is standardized what compiler they are building against, kernel /proc allows you to see what compiler was used. Why does AI, which Linus himself has compared to compilers numerous times, get a complete pass and absolutely nothing has to be specified about them whatsoever (in the anti-AI-Disclosure advocation space of course)?
-
@Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 2026-10-21 17:57
but why remove it ?
-
@Allero@lemmy.today 2026-10-22 04:45
It’s seen by a log of eyes Wonder how long before the code review is also offloaded to AI and Linux kernel becomes a black box with not even Linus himself knowing well enough how it works.
-
@racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2026-10-22 06:23
I don’t understand. Being moral is irrelevant?