2026-10-15 13:13 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@snaggen@mastodonsweden.se 2026-10-15 14:17
@jo@infosec.exchange @tante@tldr.nettime.org There are many rational reasons to be anti-AI, trained on stolen data, driving climate change, techbros being assholes aso. But saying: "- No matter how good code it produces, it is still slop!!!!" , that is just going to make you look quite irrational.
-
@davidgerard@circumstances.run 2026-10-15 14:25
@jo@infosec.exchange @tante@tldr.nettime.org "I don't vibe code, what I do is" [list of vibe coding techniques]
-
@wat3rm370n@mastodon.social 2026-10-15 15:13
@jo@infosec.exchange @tante@tldr.nettime.org 😂 lol 🤣😆 lol
-
@J2@tldr.nettime.org 2026-10-15 15:13
@jo@infosec.exchange @tante@tldr.nettime.org I had a consultant explain to me once how they were "still working on implementing another layer of AI to filter out the mistakes and hallucinations". So the fact that their demo was producing mostly garbage was nothing to worry about. 😂
-
@ethorsoe@sauna.social 2026-10-15 19:52
@jo@infosec.exchange @tante@tldr.nettime.org I use slop to describe generated code that has not been reviewed at reasonable level and has not had other methods in use to validate code quality independently of the primary generation task, it has nothing to do with quality except as indirect consequence. You probably count me as AI bro or whatever, while I do accept much of the criticism at some level.