Elektrine lite

← Feed

@communism@lemmy.ml

2026-10-23 09:45 UTC

If you actually read the article, you’ll see that “slop” in the survey does not refer to AI-driven PRs in general, but to specifically low-quality AI-generated PRs. The % of PRs with AI-generated code would be higher. 25% of all PRs being low-quality AI-generated code is a lot.

Replies (1)

  • @alottafagina@lemmy.ml 2026-10-23 10:19

    you’ll see that “slop” in the survey does not refer to AI-driven PRs in general, but to specifically low-quality AI-generated PRs. This part is actually unclear. The question posed to survey participants that allowed researchers to determine a PR was “AI slop” is left out of the report. And this line under the chart showing “25% slop etc.” is troubling: Average estimated percentage of incoming PRs that are low-quality and/or AI-generated How this particular question was framed is of critical importance here and without it, it’s easy to assume that all reported AI use was broadly categorized as “slop” Sadly I could not find a way to access the full list of questions used in the survey to confirm this.

    Open ##5210574