2026-07-14 15:51 UTC
@fullyabstract@fosstodon.org The early historical “evidence” was mostly nonsense. Joslin and Herrick were treating young people with type 1 diabetes. The rest of this piece talks about people with type 2 diabetes, which is completely different pathology.
Replies (1)
-
@naiee@mastodon.social 2026-07-14 19:22
@garland@social.seattle.wa.us @fullyabstract@fosstodon.org “Nonsense” as in type 1 and type 2 diabetes are two different things and evidence for effective treatment of one does not imply effectiveness for the other? Or “nonsense” as in you question the scientific rigor altogether?